P.O.O.R
People Organized For Our Rights, Inc.
POOR@nyc.rr.com


Online Resource Center.

Menu

Fair Hearings
OTDA Policy
Language Resources
dot
  Fair Hearing Resources:  Not Logged in     
Search Keywords or type in your question (min 3 char.)
PB Home  Back to Documents : Executive Order No. 131 (9 NYCRR § 4.131)    
Attached Document:
demers__02-01-90_memo__executive_order_no_131_.pdf


Documents : Executive Order No. 131 (9 NYCRR § 4.131)

February 1, 1990 Memo to ALJs from Susan V. Demers (Executive Order No. 131)

This memorandum was issued by General Counsel Susan V. Demers to inform all ALJs of Governor Mario Cuomo's December 4, 1989 Executive Order No. 131 [codified at 9 NYCRR § 4.131] "to ensure that the state's administrative hearing system operates in an impartial, efficient am timely manner." The Executive Order is available at: http://onlineresources.wnylc.net/FairHearingResources/docs/__Executive%20Order%20No.%20131.pdf.

According to General Counsel Demers, the Executive Order requires the following two actions that impact the Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH):

     In order to ensure the separation of hearing and program functions, and to ensure the impartiality of the Office of Administrative Hearings, a new structure will be implemented for the Office of Administrative Hearings. The position of Associate Commissioner for Administrative Hearings has been created, and I will shortly begin recruiting to fill that position. In the interim, the Bureau of Fair Hearings will continue to be supervised by Acting Deputy Counsel Russell Hanks, who will report directly to me effective today. The Bureau of Special Hearings will continue to be supervised by Deputy Counsel Peter Mullany who will also report directly to me. Previously, Russell and Peter had reported through John Robitzek, who was the Acting First Deputy Counsel. A new position of Associate Commissioner for Legal Affairs has been created and John will serve in that capacity. The Executive Order requires that this separation of functions occur and this revised reporting structure satisfies that requirement.

     The second change in the Office of Administrative Hearings practice required by the Order concerns the issuance of hearing decisions. In those rare circumstances where a decision is issued which includes findings of fact or conclusions of law which conflict with the findings, conclusions, or recommended decision of the hearing officer, the reasons why a conflicting decision was reached nrust be set forth in the decision. Nothing in the Order precludes a supervisor from giving legal advice or guidance to a hearing officer where the supervisor determines that such advice or guidance is appropriate to assure that decisions meet the quality standards of the Department and are consistent and legally sound. The reasons for reaching a conflicting decision must be set forth only in those rare instances where, despite being advised that an error of fact or law or other error has been revealed by a review of the hearing transcript and the recommended decision, the hearing officer fails to make necessary changes to the decision and the Commissioner's designee must make the changes. In all other respects the practices and procedures of our office meet or exceed the requirements of the Order and no other changes in practice or procedure will be implemented.

General Counsel Demers overlooked a third change that was necessitated by the Executive Order, namely, the development of regulations to establish a formal procure to request the recusal of an ALJ. See p. 3 of the Administrative Adjudication Plan of the New York State Department of Social Services, available at: http://onlineresources.wnylc.net/FairHearingResources/docs/_Administrative%20Adjudication%20Plan.pdf.

Recusal regulations have subsequently been promulgated at 18 NYCRR § 358-5.6(c).
 

 

Created: 1/26/2012
Updated: 1/26/2012