P.O.O.R
People Organized For Our Rights, Inc.
POOR@nyc.rr.com


Online Resource Center.

Menu

Fair Hearings
OTDA Policy
Language Resources
dot
  Fair Hearing Resources:  Not Logged in     
Search Keywords or type in your question (min 3 char.)
PB Home  Back to Documents : Credibility Determinations by ALJs    
Attached Document:
hanks__04-13-05_memo_-_meachem_v_wing.pdf


Documents : Credibility Determinations by ALJs

April 13, 2005 Memo to ALJs from Russell J. Hanks (Fair Hearing Training; Meachem v Wing)

This memorandum was issued by Russell J. Hanks, Deputy General Counsel for Administrative Hearings, as part of the Stipulation and Order of Settlement in Meachem v Wing, 99 Civ. 4630 (S.D.N.Y. April 20, 2005).

Under the heading "Fair Hearing Decisions," at p. 2, Mr. Hanks instructed:

     "When a decision adverse to the appellant turns on the credibility of the appellant, the basis for the determination should be included in the decision. Please note that the lack of documentary evidence is not a per se basis for finding an appellant's testimony incredible. A hearing officer may find uncorroborated testimony to be credible, especially when it is found to be uncontradicted or internally consistent."

 

 

Created: 12/20/2011
Updated: 12/20/2011