P.O.O.R
People Organized For Our Rights, Inc.
POOR@nyc.rr.com


Online Resource Center.

Menu

Fair Hearings
OTDA Policy
Language Resources
dot
  Fair Hearing Resources:  Not Logged in     
Search Keywords or type in your question (min 3 char.)
PB Home  Back to Documents : OAH Procedures Transmittals for 1997    
Attached Document:
97-09 Claudio-Foster Care Reimb-Amended.pdf


Documents : OAH Procedures Transmittals for 1997

97-09: Vera & Velez v. Dowling and Claudio v. Dowling - Foster Parent Standing in Foster Care Reimbursement Issues and Foster Care Denials [Amended] 04/01/97)

Pursuant to the recent decisions in Vera and Velez v. Dowling and Claudio v. Dowling, we will be reopening hearings in foster care reimbursement cases where foster parents were denied standing.

The Court of Appeals has held that the Office of Administrative Hearings must schedule hearings regarding the rate of foster care reimbursement, as well as the denial of foster care benefits, and grant standing to foster parents, regardless of whether the subject foster children still live with the foster parent requesting the hearing.

We have identified approximately 290 such cases which fall into this class and may need to be reopened de novo. The processing required to reopen these 290 pre-identified cases will be handled by designated staff, as yet to be assigned. However, we anticipate that there will be additional requests made on behalf of clients whose fair hearing numbers have been purged from the Fair Hearing Information System (FHIS), as well as duplicates from appellants whose cases are among the 290 pre-identified cases. These may be requested via telephone, letter, etc. and if it is apparent that the requester is seeking a hearing because they previously had a hearing and were denied standing, a new request should be taken.

New requests taken to grant standing to foster parents will be assigned a special tracking code of 913 to be used in addition to the issue codes 313 or 315. Requests should include the 913 tracking code and should include an appropriate comment to indicate that the new request is pursuant to the Claudio litigation. The request can then proceed routinely for supervisory approval. It is important that appellants seeking a "reopening" of these foster care issues are not dismissed by being informed that they are not entitled to a hearing on an issue that was previously heard.

If it is not apparent from the requester that the hearing request is being made in accordance with directives of the Claudio litigation at the time of request and it becomes apparent at the time of hearing, the Administrative Law Judge should add the 913 tracking code on the FH-019, Fair Hearings Data Sheet.
 

 

Created: 10/31/2010