P.O.O.R
People Organized For Our Rights, Inc.
POOR@nyc.rr.com


Online Resource Center.

Menu

Fair Hearings
OTDA Policy
Language Resources
dot
  Fair Hearing Resources:  Not Logged in     
Search Keywords or type in your question (min 3 char.)
PB Home  Back to Documents : OAH Procedures Transmittals for 2004    
Attached Document:
04-15 Roberson v Guiliano Litigation.pdf


Documents : OAH Procedures Transmittals for 2004

04-15: FHIS Coding Procedures Pursuant to Roberson v Guiliani Litigation (12/23/04)

In compliance with the settlement of the Roberson v. Giuliani litigation, the New York City Human Resources Administration (HRA) will mail notices on or about December 30, 2004 to clients who had received a Bureau of Eligibility Verification (BEV also known as EVR) notice between October, 2003 and November 30, 2004. In November, 2003, a similar notice was mailed to approximately 1,000 NYC clients. That notice/letter (form EXP-75W, 11/20/03) was dated November 24, 2003.

The November 24, 2003 notice indicated that either the client had previously been denied Temporary Assistance (TA) or TA was discontinued because the Bureau of Eligibility Verification determined that the appellant failed to provide truthful and complete information. The client may or may not have requested a fair hearing on the initial notice.

As the original BEV notices allegedly lacked sufficient explanation of the reason for the action, the November 24 notice was sent giving the client an additional 30 days to request a fair hearing on the initial notice if s/he had not previously requested one.

In coding requests pursuant to this year’s notice, OAH staff will follow the same coding procedures with the December 30, 2004 notice as was followed with the November, 2003 notice. If a previous hearing was held on the initial EVR action, the Fair Hearing Number of the previous hearing  should be noted in the Comments of the new hearing.

Standard procedures should be followed regarding reopening or rescheduling previously defaulted or withdrawn fair hearings if the appellant had requested a fair hearing on the original notice. If the original fair hearing is reopened, the new December, 2004 notice should be added as a supplemental issue. OAH staff should indicate “Roberson” in the Comments when dealing with reopened or rescheduled requests pursuant to these notices.

The new December, 2004 notices are not themselves subject to aid-continuing (AC). If the appellant makes a timely request on the original BEV discontinuance notice at the same time as receiving the December 30, 2004 notice, AC may be directed on the original issue, and the issue based on the December 30, 2004 notice should be added as an INAD 129 NA. OAH staff should indicate “Roberson” in the Comments when coding requests pursuant to these notices.

 

 

Created: 6/22/2008
Updated: 6/22/2008